Interstellar flights. Is it possible to fly to other stars? Which country will fly to the stars?

06.05.2022 Operations

Flight to the stars

From the very beginning it was clear that space solar system, its planets are within the reach of spacecraft and ships that can be created with the current level of technology and knowledge, and, therefore, people will be able, if not to land, then, in any case, to reach or reach any of its planets.

But at the same time it became clear that at home, in the solar system, we would be able to obtain data about planets, asteroids, comets, about their features, perhaps about their origin, but nothing more. Most likely, we will not learn anything unexpected or fundamentally new in the solar system. It is unlikely that data obtained from travel through our solar system will make significant progress in our understanding of the world in which we live.

Naturally, the thought turns to the stars. After all, it was previously understood that flights near the Earth, flights to other planets of our solar system were not the ultimate goal. Paving the way to the stars seemed to be the main task. It is not for nothing that, although somewhat prematurely, the Americans called their cosmonauts astronauts, that is, astronauts.

This gave rise to thoughts about starships, and therefore the name itself arose. spaceship" We, the creators, called it a spaceship. Korolev did not accept this name. Now I don’t even remember when and which of us suggested calling our future car a ship. But I remember well how one day I was shown a photo montage reprinted from some foreign magazine: a caravel against the backdrop of the Horsehead Nebula, flying away in full sail into the distance! Ship! This is exactly what corresponded to our aspirations.

Sooner or later, human thought had to return to starships. What should they be? What problems need to be solved for star flights to become a reality?

If we talk about automatic spacecraft sent to the nearest stars, then in principle this problem does not seem insurmountable.

But reflections and simple estimates of the parameters of ships for human flights to the stars show that, trying to solve the problem of carrying out stellar flights, we are faced with fundamental difficulties.

The first problem is time. Even if we managed to build a starship that could fly at a speed close to the speed of light, the travel time in our Galaxy alone would be calculated in millennia and tens of millennia, since its diameter is about 100,000 light years. And flights outside the galaxy will require many times more time. So, when considering the problem of traveling to the stars, we will limit ourselves to our Galaxy.

Let’s imagine that science will be able to freeze astronauts for a certain number of years so that they “come to life” when they arrive at their destination, or send human embryos on a journey. And even if this problem is solved not only technically, but also morally, then after the trip they will return to a world completely alien to them. It is enough to remember the changes that have occurred over the past 200 years (and here we are talking about tens of millennia!), and it becomes clear that after returning, the astronauts will find themselves in a completely unfamiliar world: a flight to the stars will almost always be a one-way flight. For those around us, relatives and friends of space travelers, this will be something like seeing off a loved one on their last journey.

The second problem is the dangerous flow of particles, gas and dust. The space between the stars is not empty. Everywhere there are remnants of gas, dust, streams of particles. If they attempt to travel close enough to the speed of light, they will create a stream of high energy particles that will impact the ship and be nearly impossible to defend against.

The third problem is energy. If the most efficient thermonuclear reaction is used in the ship’s rocket engine, then to travel in both directions at a speed close to the speed of light, even with an ideal design of the rocket system, the ratio of the initial mass to the final mass is required to be no less than ten to the thirtieth power, which seems unrealistic .

As for creating a photon engine for a starship that uses matter annihilation, there are still a lot of problems looming here (storing gigantic reserves of antimatter, protecting the structure of the ship and the mirror of the photon engine from the released energy and from that part of the antimatter that will not undergo annihilation in the engine, and etc.), and no solution is visible to any of them.

But let’s even assume that we manage to make a photon engine. Let's try to imagine a galactic photon ship capable of flying at a speed close enough to the speed of light to remove the problems of time. The actual flight time of astronauts back and forth on a journey over a distance of the order of half the diameter of our Galaxy with an optimal flight schedule (continuous acceleration and then continuous deceleration) will be (according to the clock on the ship) about 42 years when flying with an acceleration (acceleration or deceleration) equal to Earth's acceleration due to gravity. According to the clock, about 100,000 years will pass on Earth.

Let's assume that we managed to obtain an ideal process in a photonic engine, make an ideal design with zero mass of tanks (which, of course, cannot be, but this only means that in reality the results will be much worse), and let's try to estimate some parameters of such an ideal ship to fly approximately half the diameter of the Galaxy. It turns out that the ratio of the initial mass of the ship to the final mass will be about ten to the nineteenth power! This means that with the mass of living and working premises and equipment (that is, everything that the ship is carrying) equal to only 100 tons, the launch mass will be greater than the mass of the Moon. Moreover, half of this mass is antimatter. Where can I get it from? How to transfer force to it for acceleration?

From today's ideas about the world, one gets the impression that it is impossible to solve the problem of transporting material bodies over galactic distances at speeds close to the speed of light; it is pointless to break through space and time with the help of a mechanical structure.

It is necessary to find a way of interstellar travel that is not associated with the need to transport a material body. This idea has long been used in science fiction literature (which in itself should not be confusing, since more than once global scientific goals were first formulated in fairy tales and science fiction literature) - the idea of ​​the travel of intelligent beings in the form of a package of information.

Electromagnetic waves propagate virtually losslessly throughout the observable Universe. Perhaps here lies the key to unraveling the mystery of interstellar travel.

Without falling into mysticism, we must admit that the personality of a modern person cannot be separated from the body. But it is possible to imagine a specially designed individual in which the personality can be separated from the body, in the same way that the software can be separated from the design of modern electronic computers.

Personality is an individual complex of characteristics of a given person in his perception of the outside world, in his information processing algorithms and reactions to received information, in his imagination, likes and dislikes, in his knowledge.

If a package of information, which is a complete description of a person, can be rewritten from its fields of operational operations and storage devices, then this package of information can be transmitted via a communication line to the destination receiving station and there rewritten into a standard tangible medium (either selected according to the price list, or ...), in which the traveler can already live, act, move, and satisfy his curiosity.

At the time of transmission of the identity information packet, such individual is not alive. In order for him to exist and act, his personality (a package of information) must be placed in a material medium. His personality, if you like - his spirit, can only exist on the material fields of operations and storage devices.

Such a method of solving the problem of flying to the stars would be the realization not only of the plots of modern science fiction, but also of ancient myths, fairy tales, legends about ascension to heaven and overthrow into hell, about flying vessels and about worlds where people appear and disappear, oh transmigration of souls. Perhaps then philosophical disputes about man, about the frailty of his bodily shell and the essence of being would be resolved. What is a person? What is truth?

It is interesting that outstanding philosophers in different historical periods, from antiquity to our time, through logical analysis (based, by the way, not on knowledge) came to completely modern ideas about the relationship between the inner essence and the human body. The life of a person is the life of his soul, it is the thought of oneself beating in helpless efforts (what am I?), about the world outside oneself and within oneself, aesthetic pleasure in beauty and rejection of the primitive and untruth, this is freedom of thought and analysis. We are here, we live, as long as we are able to think, evaluate, process information and generate it. The rest of me, my body, is for maintenance.

Our brain is a field of mathematical operations with symbols, numbers, concepts, rules and algorithms. These operations provide synthesis of incoming information and its analysis. The algorithms that have developed in a particular person for processing, analyzing and evaluating information determine his aesthetics and self-perception, his sense of his own existence. Of course, these operations are performed according to rules specific to a given person. These rules are gradually formed in the brain of the individual (as a result of his experience in receiving and processing information, experience of his own activities and its evaluation) and are written on the fields of mathematical operations and on the storage devices of his brain. Moreover, over the course of life, these rules can improve, change (as a person himself changes over time), and deteriorate. Recorded on a material medium, they seem to become material. But these operations, thoughts, experiences themselves are something that cannot be seen or “touched.” Man has always tried to materialize this something in the form of sounds, words, colors. But always an attempt at self-expression turned out to be only a shadow, a weak echo of this something.

The body is the servicing systems of the field of mathematical operations (nutrition, cleaning, movement, means of communication with the outside world, etc.). But the vast majority of people, almost all and almost always, did not distinguish between their “I” and their body. And they always strived to better arrange their body.

There is logic in this: without nutrition, the brain dies, the field of operations disintegrates, and personality disappears. In a healthy body, a “computer” works with fewer failures, at a higher speed (due to parallel operations, and generally due to better algorithms), and provides greater internal resistance to external threats and complications. And most importantly, it provides clarity of thinking.

Perhaps that is why the desire to please one’s body from generation to generation remained the main driving force of the human race. It determined predatory campaigns, the creation of new technologies, and the desire for a better organization of social life (including the “let’s rob the rich” method, disguised with the slogan “down with exploitation”). Houses, cars, airplanes, gas, electricity, computer technology were born from this desire. The desire to provide maximum comfort to the body has been and remains the main driver in people's lives.

But in fact, this is secondary. Our “I”, our individuality, our essence, our being is not a material shell. And there is nothing contradictory to our perception of the world in the idea of ​​the fundamental possibility of separating individuality and its material carrier.

Therefore, from an engineering point of view, it seems possible to construct a person whose soul can be separated from the body, and perhaps to construct a world where a person can almost instantly (say, within the solar system) move from one planet to another.

Is it permissible to create such a creature? Do we have the right to do this? What life incentives can we offer him? It is in these matters the main problem.

We are most likely a product of organic evolution. The instinct of life, the instinct of procreation, is deeply embedded in us. When this instinct dies with age, health, and living conditions, a person loses the desire to live. And what stimulus of life can we offer our creation? Curiosity? desire to be useful people who created his body (perishable and replaceable) and raised his personality and soul? The desire to develop yourself in world exploration, in ultra-long-distance travel, in the creation of transceiver stations for travel, in the construction of circumstellar space bases?

Are these incentives convincing? Where does he get affection and love for his neighbors? How to raise him so that he does not turn out to be a monster with absurd and senseless aspirations for power, for the opportunity to give instructions, educate and be known as a benefactor? Or vice versa, so that he does not turn out to be an infantile, uninitiative being, indifferent to the world, to his neighbors and to himself?

And of course, enormous technical problems stand in the way of creating such a creature. How do we think? How are stereotypes of our reactions, behavior, assessments created, how is our individuality born? Most likely, algorithms for perceiving the surrounding world, analyzing, and thinking arise anew in every person and, to one degree or another, in a different way. Their character is determined by genes, environment, the structure of society, the joys and sorrows of their childhood. In a society of slaves, slaves grow up; in a society of free people, independent individuals who respect their own dignity grow up. From this point of view, standardized methods of education: nurseries, kindergartens, schools are very dangerous. This is the worst thing you can do for your future. Humanity can only be strong through diversity and individuality. Of course, some basic covenants, commandments should be common to everyone: love your neighbor, do not steal, do not kill, do not covet... But to form a person according to the standard is to prepare for your own death.

How can you start creating artificial intelligence without understanding all these things? Inevitable tragic mistakes and failures await us on this road. But this idea has already entered the consciousness of the most curious and enterprising. We must assume that this matter will develop.

More understandable difficulties will appear.

If you “transmit personality” over galactic distances, you will have to create antennas with dimensions of the order of kilometers and transmitters with a power of the order of hundreds of millions of kilowatts. But to implement this method of galactic travel, it is necessary not only to create a new cosmic person, whose personality can be separated from the body, from a material carrier and transmitted in the form of a package of information through a communication channel, but also to create receiving and transmitting stations (for example, in the radio range) , transport them (for example, using automatic spacecraft) to possible destinations (located, as a rule, not far from any star to provide transceiver stations with energy). In this case, you can transport transceiver stations, but you can only transport technology minimum set tools and robots to manufacture them at the destination.

But delivering stations at speeds of the order of hundreds and even thousands of kilometers per second to stars located at distances of tens of light years from us will require millennia and tens of millennia. During this time, interest in the enterprise itself may be lost.

Nevertheless, this path lies within the framework of the possible.

One can imagine another way for space man to carry out stellar travel: through contact with other civilizations.

In fact, all of humanity will participate in establishing the exchange of information during the trip. Information received from another world about it, about its inhabitants, their life, and information transmitted there about our life will be the journey of all humanity to the stars.

And again the same eternal question arises: how to get in touch with other civilizations?

The logical path: declare yourself, create and turn on a beacon, receive a request and begin communication. If we proceed from the idea of ​​​​creating a pulsed radio beacon emitting in all directions (for example, along the plane of the Galaxy), receiving energy from the Sun using solar panels with a capacity of a billion kilowatts (the assessment was carried out in relation to a beacon with a frequency band of only 100 hertz), then from subscribers looking for beacons, it will be necessary to create receiving antennas with diameters from 1 to 10–20 kilometers for searching at distances, respectively, from one to fifty thousand light years. A billion kilowatts of power can be obtained from solar panels with dimensions of about 100 by 100 kilometers. Gigantic in size, but quite visible. The design of such solar batteries can be imagined as a truss platform with film solar batteries stretched on it.

If we talk about communication with civilizations that are thousands or tens of thousands of years distant from us, then the time frame for contacting other civilizations will be, respectively, thousands and tens of thousands of years. Not millions anymore, but still a very long time.

Could there be a shorter way? Maybe. If some other civilizations chose this path of establishing connections in our Galaxy, then they could have already created and turned on their beacons. This means that we need to look for these beacons, build receiving antennas capable of receiving signals from galactic beacons. Radio telescopes with antennas measuring kilometers in size can be built in near-Earth orbits and in the orbits of solar satellites in the coming decades.

The time it takes to receive signals from other civilizations will be determined by the time it takes to create large space radio telescopes and the time it takes to search for beacon signals. But where to look? Perhaps near the center of the Galaxy, perhaps along the midlines of the spiral arms of the Galaxy, perhaps in globular star clusters, close to the galactic plane. Or near stars with planetary systems. One way or another, this has already been decades, not thousands or millions of years.

Is there an easier way to communicate with other civilizations?

Let's assume that representatives of other civilizations were (or are?) already on Earth or in the solar system. How to find them, what could be the traces of their activities? Where might their transceiver stations be located?

There are two search directions here.

The cosmic beings themselves, what could they be? Dimensions, features of their life. They probably don’t need an atmosphere and organic matter for nutrition, and space is their natural habitat? How to find them? Why don't they contact us? The search for answers to these questions is the first direction.

The second direction is related to the search for their means of communication, the search for stations for receiving and sending travelers.

Reflections on the problem of flights to the stars allow us to identify several promising areas of work: the creation of larger and larger radio telescopes, the development of space robots, the development of the design and ideology of lighthouses in order to find the most effective method their search, research into the possibility of creating and developing artificial intelligence, searching for communication channels for other civilizations in the Solar System. These directions are fully consistent with the modern needs of humanity.

Works on artificial intelligence are associated with solving the problem of creating sufficiently effective robots that could replace people in dangerous industries, save them from labor in mines, from routine work, which would help us in exploring the underwater world and in construction. The creation of large radio telescopes will make it possible to conduct the most effective studies of the Universe both at its borders and in the center of the Galaxy.

The purpose of such reflections at the level of science fiction is to look ahead in order to select the long-term prospects that face us, to determine the directions of search, to compare them with current problems of ecology and economics, the arrangement of human life on Earth, with today’s interesting tasks in the study of the Universe, and from This analysis will identify areas of work on which it is worth spending the total funds, energy and intelligence of people. This is worth doing in order to make balanced and reasonable decisions about your choice.

And what ideas and goals will we leave to our descendants? Don't let tyrants, adventurers and just crooks get close to power? But this was clear to people even in ancient times. True, it was usually not possible to realize this understanding. The idea of ​​a clean land - without stinking dead rivers, without deserts (instead of forests), without radiation bald spots on the living body of the planet? People realized this at the end of the 19th century. Maybe our legacy to our descendants is to fly to the stars and search for connections with other civilizations? These ideas were born in the science fiction literature of the 20th century. To figure out how our world, our Universe, is structured - humanity has been preoccupied with this for many centuries. Or maybe everything has already been bequeathed to us, and our task is to try, in our temporary round of human development, to realize the goals set for earthlings?

From the book Manned Flights to the Moon author Shuneyko Ivan Ivanovich

Flight with a constant angle of inclination of the trajectory Considering the movement of a rocket along a trajectory with a constant inclination angle in a constant gravitational field, we assume that thrust, fuel consumption and specific impulse are linear bounded functions of the relation

From the book Battle for the Stars-2. Space Confrontation (Part I) author Pervushin Anton Ivanovich

Flight with a variable inclination angle of the trajectory In practical cases, the inclination angle of the rocket's flight path changes over time, and the optimal specific impulse value is not constant for the entire flight. Lower specific impulse with higher thrust is beneficial for

From the book Battle for the Stars-2. Space Confrontation (Part II) author Pervushin Anton Ivanovich

Time-varying flight (class 2). As follows from Fig. 31.3, the launch time for a task belonging to class 2 is determined much more simply. The launch times for the first and second possibilities in case c (Fig. 31.3) are not the same due to the precession of the orbit at the moment

From the book Take Off 2006 12 author author unknown

From the book The Rustle of a Grenade author Prishchepenko Alexander Borisovich

The first and last flight of "Buran" The program for the first flight of an orbital aircraft, which retained the name "Buran", was repeatedly revised. Three-day and two-orbit options were proposed. According to the first option, special difficulties could be caused by something that is not

From the book Ritz's Ballistic Theory and the Picture of the Universe author Semikov Sergey Alexandrovich

Project Noah's Ark, or NASA on its way to the stars At the annual meeting of members of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, held in February 2002, a NASA representative announced that the agency was going to send a “generation ship” beyond the solar system with

From the book Takeoff 2008 01-02 author author unknown

The “flight” to Mars starts in a year. In preparation for a unique 500-day experiment to simulate a manned flight to Mars (the “Mars-500” program), which is scheduled to begin in the 4th quarter of 2007, the recruitment of volunteers continues.

From the book Wings of Sikorsky author Katyshev Gennady Ivanovich

5.6. Flight with a load of explosives. Meeting with the “black widow” Under the sweet sound of the fanfare of the first successes, preparations began for Nalchik. In addition to the test team, the Air Force plane was supposed to deliver there E-9 assemblies and more than six hundred kilograms of explosives: plastic, with a consistency

From the book TAKE OFF 2011 06 author author unknown

§ 5.11 Cosmic rays - the path to the stars ... The planet is the cradle of the mind, but you cannot live forever in the cradle. ...Humanity will not remain forever on Earth, but in pursuit of light and space, it will first timidly penetrate beyond the atmosphere, and then conquer everything around the sun

From the book The Trajectory of Life [with illustrations] author Feoktistov Konstantin Petrovich

Taking flight after... 45 years! A group of enthusiasts from the Design Bureau “Modern Aviation Technologies” prepared an unexpected surprise for connoisseurs of the history of Russian aviation before the New Year. Inhabitants of LII named after. MM. Gromov and surrounding holiday villages with great surprise

From the book 100 Great Achievements in the World of Technology author Zigunenko Stanislav Nikolaevich

FIRST FLIGHT The morning of June 3, 1910 in Kyiv turned out to be quiet and cloudless. A light breeze was blowing. The whole team was assembled. BiS-2 was rolled out of the hangar. Igor took the pilot's seat. "Contact!" The motor started working immediately. After warming up, the pilot gave maximum throttle. Three people could barely hold on

From the book Take Off, 20013 No. 11 by the author

MRJ first flight in a year The past year did not bring any significant changes to the program of the first Japanese regional jet aircraft, MRJ, created by Mitsubishi Aircraft Corporation. On September 15, 2010, Mitsubishi management announced

From the author's book

First flight When developing the Vostok spacecraft, we sought to make it not only quickly, faster than the Americans (they have already announced that they will develop a spacecraft), but, most importantly, to make it reliable. A rather trivial formulation of the problem. But how can this be

From the author's book

Fossett's flight around the world In March 2005, the famous American businessman and traveler Steve Fossett, as you know, set a new record. Previously, he flew around the globe alone on hot-air balloon, then did the same on an airplane in 67 hours and 2 minutes. How does he

From the author's book

“Dobrolyot” is in a hurry to fly In 2014, Aeroflot’s long-nurtured plans to create a low-cost airline should finally become a reality. On October 10, it was announced that the Aeroflot group of companies had its own low-cost airline. New domestic

From the author's book

Anatoly Yurtaev: “a year has passed, the flight is normal!” The head of Angara Airlines about the operation of the An-148 A year has passed since one of the main regional air carriers in Eastern Siberia, Angara Airlines (part of the Eastland group of companies), became

During the layout process, number registers and typos in formulas were corrected. Presented in a readable table format.
Ivan Alexandrovich Korznikov
The realities of interstellar flights

People have long dreamed of flying through outer space to other stars, traveling to other worlds and meeting with unearthly intelligence. Science fiction writers wrote up mountains of paper, trying to imagine how this would happen; they came up with a variety of techniques that could make these dreams come true. But for now these are just fantasies. Let's try to imagine what such a flight might look like in reality.
The distances between the stars are so great that light from one star to another travels for years, and it moves at a very high speed With =299 793 458 m/s. To measure these distances, astronomers use a special unit - the light year, which is equal to the distance that light travels in 1 year: 1 St. year = 9.46 10 15 meters (this is approximately 600 once more sizes solar system). Astronomers have calculated that in a sphere with a radius 21.2 there are light years around the Sun 100 stars included in 72 stellar systems (double, triple, etc. systems of nearby stars). From here it is easy to find that on average there is a volume of space per one star system 539 cubic light years, and the average distance between star systems is approximately 8.13 light years. The actual distance may be less - for example, to the star closest to the Sun, Proxima Centauri 4.35 St. l, but in any case, interstellar flight involves covering a distance of at least several light years. This means that the speed of the starship must be no less than 0.1 c - then the flight will take several decades and can be carried out by one generation of astronauts.
Thus, the speed of the starship should be greater 30 000 km/s For earthly technology this is still an unattainable value - we have barely mastered speeds a thousand times lower. But let’s assume that all the technical problems have been solved, and our spaceship has an engine (photon or any other) capable of accelerating the spacecraft to such speeds. We are not interested in the details of its design and functioning; only one circumstance is important for us here: modern science knows only one way of acceleration in outer space - jet propulsion, which is based on the fulfillment of the law of conservation of momentum of a system of bodies. And the important thing here is that with such movement the starship (and any other body) moves in space, physically interacting with everything that is in it.
In their fantasies, science fiction writers have come up with various “hyperspace jumps” and “subspace transitions” from one point in space to another, bypassing intermediate regions of space, but all this, according to the ideas of modern science, has no chance of being realized in reality. Modern science has firmly established that in nature certain laws of conservation are satisfied: the law of conservation of momentum, energy, charge, etc. And with a “hyperspace jump” it turns out that in a certain region of space the energy, momentum and charges of a physical body simply disappear, that is these laws are not enforced. From the point of view of modern science, this means that such a process cannot be carried out. And the main thing is that it is not clear what it is at all, it is “hyperspace” or “subspace”, once in which the physical body stops interacting with bodies in real space. In the real world, there is only that which manifests itself in interaction with other bodies (in fact, space is the relationship of existing bodies), and this means that such a body will actually cease to exist - with all the ensuing consequences. So all these are fruitless fantasies that cannot be the subject of serious discussion.
So, let’s assume that the existing jet engine accelerated the spaceship to the sublight speed we need, and at this speed it moves in outer space from one star to another. Some aspects of such a flight have long been discussed by scientists (, ), but they mainly consider the various relativistic effects of such a movement, without paying attention to other significant aspects of interstellar flight. But the reality is that outer space is not an absolute void, it is a physical medium, which is commonly called the interstellar medium. It contains atoms, molecules, dust particles and other physical bodies. And the spaceship will have to physically interact with all these bodies, which becomes a problem when moving at such speeds. Let's look at this problem in more detail.
Astronomers, observing radio emission from the cosmic environment and the passage of light through it, have found that there are atoms and molecules of gases in outer space: these are mainly hydrogen atoms N , hydrogen molecules H 2 (there are about the same number of them as there are atoms N ), helium atoms Not (them in 6 times less than atoms N ), and atoms of other elements (mostly carbon C, oxygen ABOUT and nitrogen N ), which in total amount to about 1 % of all atoms. Even such complex molecules as CO 2, CH 4, HCN, H 2 O, NH 3, HCOOH and others, but in tiny quantities (there are billions of times less of them than atoms N ). The concentration of interstellar gas is very small and (far from gas and dust clouds) averages 0,5-0,7 atoms per 1 cm 3.
It is clear that when a starship moves in such an environment, this interstellar gas will exert resistance, slowing down the starship and destroying its shells. Therefore, it was proposed to turn the harm into benefit and create a ramjet engine, which, by collecting interstellar gas (and it is on 94 % consists of hydrogen) and annihilating it with the antimatter reserves on board, would thus receive energy for the movement of the starship. According to the authors' project, in front of the starship there should be an ionizing source (creating an electron or photon beam that ionizes the incoming atoms) and a magnetic coil that focuses the resulting protons towards the axis of the starship, where they are used to create a photonic jet stream.
Unfortunately, upon closer examination it turns out that this project is not feasible. First of all, an ionizing beam cannot be electron (as the authors insist) for the simple reason that a starship emitting electrons will itself be charged with a positive charge, and sooner or later the fields created by this charge will disrupt the operation of the starship's systems. If you use a photon beam, then (however, as for an electron beam), the matter comes down to the small cross section for photoionization of atoms. The problem is that the probability of an atom being ionized by a photon is very small (so the air is not ionized by powerful laser beams). It is expressed quantitatively by the ionization cross section, which is numerically equal to the ratio of the number of ionized atoms to the photon flux density (the number of incident photons per 1 cm 2 per second). Photoionization of hydrogen atoms begins at photon energy 13.6 electronvolt= 2.18·10 -18 J (wavelength 91.2 nm), and at this energy the photoionization cross section is maximum and equal to 6.3·10 -18 cm 2 (p. 410). This means that to ionize one hydrogen atom it takes on average 1.6 10 17 photons per cm 2 per second. Therefore, the power of such an ionizing beam must be gigantic: if the starship moves at a speed v then for 1 for a second 1 cm 2 of its surface flies rv colliding atoms, where r - concentration of atoms, which in our case of near-light motion will be of the order of magnitude rv=0.7·3·10 10 =2·10 10 atoms per second 1 cm 2. This means that the flux of ionizing photons must be no less n= 2·10 10 / 6.3·10 -18 =3·10 27 1/cm 2 s. The energy carried by such a stream of photons will be equal to e=2.18·10 -18 ·3·10 27 =6.5·10 9 J/cm 2 s.
In addition, in addition to hydrogen atoms, the same number of molecules will fly into the spaceship H 2 , and their ionization occurs at photon energy 15.4 eV (wavelength 80.4 nm). This will require approximately doubling the flow power, and the total flow power should be e=1.3·10 10 J/cm2. For comparison, we can point out that the flux of photon energy on the surface of the Sun is equal to 6.2 10 3 J/cm 2 s, that is, the spacecraft should shine two million times brighter than the Sun.
Since the energy and momentum of a photon are related by the relation E=rs , then this stream of photons will have momentum р=еS/с Where S - mass intake area (about 1000 m 2), which will be 1.3 10 10 10 7 / 3 10 8 =4.3 10 8 Kg·m/s, and this impulse is directed against the speed and slows down the spaceship. In fact, it turns out that there is a photon engine in front of the starship and pushes it in the opposite direction - it is clear that such a push-pull will not fly far.
Thus, the ionization of incident particles is too expensive, and modern science does not know any other way to concentrate interstellar gases. But even if such a method is found, the ramjet engine will still not justify itself: Zenger also showed (p. 112) that the amount of thrust of a ramjet photonic jet engine is negligible and it cannot be used to accelerate a rocket with high acceleration. Indeed, the total influx of mass of incident particles (mainly hydrogen atoms and molecules) will be dm=3m p Srv=3 1.67 10 -27 10 7 2 10 10 =10 -9 Kg/s. Upon annihilation, this mass will release a maximum W=mc 2 = 9 10 7 J/s, and if all this energy is spent on the formation of a photon jet stream, then the increase in the momentum of the starship per second will be dр=W/c=9·10 7 /3·10 8 =0.3 Kg m/s, which corresponds to a thrust of 0.3 Newton. With approximately the same force a small mouse presses on the ground, and it turns out that the mountain gave birth to a mouse. Therefore, designing ramjet engines for interstellar flights does not make sense.

From the above it follows that it will not be possible to deflect the incoming particles of the interstellar medium, and the starship will have to accept them with its body. This leads to some requirements for the design of the starship: in front of it there must be a screen (for example, in the form of a conical cover), which will protect the main body from the effects of cosmic particles and radiation. And behind the screen there should be a radiator that removes heat from the screen (and at the same time serves as a secondary screen), attached to the main body of the starship with thermal insulating beams. The need for such a design is explained by the fact that the incident atoms have high kinetic energy; they will penetrate deeply into the screen and, decelerating in it, dissipate this energy in the form of heat. For example, at flight speed 0,75 c the energy of a hydrogen proton will be approximately 500 MeV - in nuclear physics units, which corresponds to 8·10 -11 J. It will penetrate the screen to a depth of several millimeters and transfer this energy to vibrations of the atoms of the screen. And such particles will fly about 2 10 10 atoms and the same number of hydrogen molecules per second per 1 cm 2, that is, every second for 1 2cm screen surface will be supplied 4.8 J of energy converted into heat. But the problem is that in space this heat can only be removed by emitting electromagnetic waves into the surrounding space (there is no air or water there). This means that the screen will heat up until its thermal electromagnetic radiation will not be equal to the power coming from the incident particles. Thermal radiation of electromagnetic energy by a body is determined by the Stefan-Boltzmann law, according to which the energy emitted per second with 1 cm 2 surface is equal q=sТ 4 Where s=5.67·10 -12 J/cm 2 K 4 is Stefan’s constant, and T - body surface temperature. The condition for establishing equilibrium will be sТ 4 =Q Where Q - incoming power, that is, the screen temperature will be T=(Q/s) 1/4 . Substituting the corresponding values ​​into this formula, we find that the screen will heat up to a temperature 959 o K = 686 o C. It is clear that at high speeds this temperature will be even higher. This means, for example, that the screen cannot be made of aluminum (its melting point is only 660 o C), and it needs to be thermally insulated from the main body of the starship - otherwise the living compartments will become unacceptably warm. And to facilitate the thermal regime of the screen, it is necessary to attach a radiator with a large radiation surface (can be made of aluminum), for example, in the form of a cellular system of longitudinal and transverse ribs, while the transverse ribs will simultaneously serve as secondary screens, protecting the living compartments from fragments and bremsstrahlung radiation particles falling into the screen, etc.

But protection from atoms and molecules is not the main problem of interstellar flight. Astronomers, observing the absorption of light from stars, have determined that there is a significant amount of dust in interstellar space. Such particles, which strongly scatter and absorb light, have dimensions 0.1-1 microns and mass of the order 10 -13 g, and their concentration is much less than the concentration of atoms and is approximately equal to r=10 -12 1/cm 3 Judging by their density ( 1 g/cm 3) and refractive index ( n=1.3 ) they are mainly snowballs consisting of frozen cosmic gases (hydrogen, water, methane, ammonia) with an admixture of solid carbon and metal particles. Apparently, it is from them that the nuclei of comets with the same composition are formed. And although these should be fairly loose formations, at near-light speeds they can cause great harm.
At such speeds, relativistic effects begin to manifest themselves strongly, and the kinetic energy of the body in the relativistic region is determined by the expression

As can be seen, the energy of a body increases sharply as v approaches the speed of light c: So, at a speed 0.7 with a speck of dust m=10 -13 g has kinetic energy 3.59 J (see Table 1) and hitting it on the screen is equivalent to an explosion in it of approximately 1 mg of TNT. At speed 0.99 this speck of dust will have energy 54.7 J, which is comparable to the energy of a bullet fired from a Makarov pistol ( 80 J). At such speeds, it turns out that every square centimeter of the screen surface is continuously fired at by bullets (and explosive ones) with a frequency 12 shots per minute. It is clear that no screen will withstand such exposure over several years of flight.

Table 1 Energy ratios

0.1 4.73 4.53 10 14 1.09 10 5 0.2 19.35 1.85 10 15 4.45 10 5 0.3 45.31 4.34 10 15 1.04 10 6 0.4 85.47 8.19 10 15 1.97 10 6 0.5 145.2 1.39 10 16 3.34 10 6 0.6 234.6 2.25 10 16 5.40 10 6 0.7 375.6 3.59 10 16 8.65 10 6 0.8 625.6 5.99 10 16 1.44 10 7 0.9 1214 1.16 10 17 2.79 10 7 0.99 5713 5.47 10 17 1.31 10 8 0.999 20049 1.92 10 18 4.62 10 8
v/c 1/(1-v 2 /c 2) 1/2 E p K T
1.005
1.020
1.048
1.091
1.155
1.25
1.40
1.667
2.294
7.089
22.37

Designations: E r - kinetic energy of the proton in MeV TO - kinetic energy of 1 kg of substance in J T - TNT equivalent of a kilogram in tons of TNT.

To assess the consequences of a particle hitting a surface, you can use the formula proposed by F. Whipple, an expert on these issues (p. 134), according to which the dimensions of the resulting crater are equal to

Where d - density of the screen substance, Q - its specific heat of fusion.

But here we need to keep in mind that we actually don’t know how dust particles will affect the screen material at such speeds. This formula is valid for low impact velocities (of the order 50 km/s or less), and at near-light speeds of impact, the physical processes of impact and explosion should proceed completely differently and much more intense. One can only assume that due to relativistic effects and the large inertia of the dust grain material, the explosion will be directed deep into the screen, like a cumulative explosion, and will lead to the formation of a much deeper crater. The given formula reflects general energy relationships, and we assume that it is suitable for assessing the results of an impact and for near-light speeds.
Apparently, the best material for the screen is titanium (due to its low density and physical characteristics), for which d=4.5 g/cm 3 and Q=315 KJ/Kg, which gives

d=0.00126· E 1/3 meters

At v=0.1 c we get E=0.045 J and d=0.00126·0.356=0.000448 m= 0.45 mm. It is easy to find that after going through the 1 light year, the starship screen will meet n=rs=10 -12 ·9.46·10 17 =10 6 specks of dust for every cm 2, and every 500 dust particles will remove a layer 0.448 mm screen. So after 1 light years of travel the screen will be erased by the thickness 90 cm. It follows that for flight at such speeds, say, to Proxima Centauri (only there), the screen should have a thickness of approximately 5 meters and mass about 2.25 thousand tons. At high speeds the situation will be even worse:

Table 2 Thickness X titanium, erasable 1 light year travel

0.1 0.448 0.9 0.2 0.718 3.66 0.3 0.955 9.01 0.4 1.178 16.4 0.5 1.41 27.6
v/c E d mm X m
0.045
0.185
0.434
0.818
1.39
. . .

As can be seen, when v/c >0.1 the screen will have to have an unacceptable thickness (tens and hundreds of meters) and mass (hundreds of thousands of tons). Actually, then the spacecraft will consist mainly of this screen and fuel, which will require several million tons. Due to these circumstances, flights at such speeds are impossible.

The considered abrasive effect of cosmic dust does not actually exhaust the entire range of impacts that a starship will undergo during interstellar flight. It is obvious that in interstellar space there are not only dust grains, but also bodies of other sizes and masses, but astronomers cannot directly observe them due to the fact that although their sizes are larger, they themselves are smaller, so they do not make a noticeable contribution to absorption of starlight (the dust grains discussed earlier have a size on the order of the wavelength of visible light and therefore strongly absorb and scatter it, and there are quite a lot of them, which is why astronomers mainly observe them).
But we can get an idea about bodies in deep space from those bodies that we observe in the solar system, including near the Earth. Indeed, as measurements show, the solar system moves relative to neighboring stars approximately in the direction of Vega at a speed 15.5 km/s, which means that every second it sweeps up more and more new volumes of outer space along with its contents. Of course, not everything near the Sun came from outside; many bodies were originally elements of the solar system (planets, asteroids, many meteor showers). But astronomers have more than once observed, for example, the flight of some comets that arrived from interstellar space and flew back there. This means that there are also very large bodies (weighing millions and billions of tons), but they are very rare. It is clear that bodies of almost any mass can meet there, but with different probabilities. And in order to estimate the probability of encountering various bodies in interstellar space, we need to find the distribution of such bodies by mass.
First of all, you need to know what happens to bodies when they are in the solar system. This question has been well studied by astrophysicists, and they have found that the lifetime of not very large bodies in the solar system is very limited. Thus, small particles and dust particles with masses less than 10 -12 g are simply pushed out of the solar system by streams of light and protons from the Sun (as can be seen in the tails of comets). For larger particles, the result is the opposite: as a result of the so-called Poynting-Robertson effect, they fall towards the Sun, gradually descending towards it in a spiral over a period of about several tens of thousands of years.
This means that the sporadic particles and micrometeorites observed in the solar system (not related to its own meteor showers) entered it from the surrounding space, since its own particles of this type have long disappeared. Therefore, the desired dependence can be found from observations of sporadic particles in the solar system itself. Such observations have been carried out for a long time, and researchers have come to the conclusion (,) that the law of distribution of cosmic bodies by mass has the form N(M)=N 0 /M i Direct measurements for sporadic meteors in the mass range from 10 -3 before 10 2 g (p. 127) is given for the flux density of meteors with a mass of more than M gram addiction

F( M)=Ф(1)/ M 1.1

The most reliable results on this issue were obtained from measurements of microcraters formed on the surfaces of spacecraft (p. 195), they also give k=1.1 in the mass range from 10 -6 before 10 5 d. For smaller masses, it remains to be assumed that this distribution holds for them as well. For the magnitude of the particle flux is more massive 1 G different measurements give values 10 -15 1) 2·10 -14 1/m 2 s, and since the magnitude of the flow is related to the spatial density of bodies by the relation Ф=rv , then from here we can find that the concentration in space of bodies with a mass of more than M is given by the formula

r( M)=r 1 /M 1.1

where is the parameter r 1 can be found by taking the average speed of sporadic meteor particles to be v=15 km/s (as can be seen from P. Millman’s measurements), then r 1 =Ф(1)/v turns out to be equal on average 5·10 -25 1/cm 3.
From the resulting distribution we can find that the concentration of particles whose masses are greater 0.1 g is on average equal to r(0.1)=r 1· (10) · 1.1=6.29 · 10 -24 1/cm 3, which means that on the way to 1 the starship will meet a light year at 1 cm 2 surfaces n=rs=5.9·10 -6 such particles that with a total area S=100 m 2 = 10 6 cm 2 will be no less 5 particles are more massive 0.1 g over the entire cross section of the starship. And each such particle v=0.1 c has energy more 4.53 10 10 J, which is equivalent to a cumulative explosion 11 tons of TNT. Even if the screen can withstand this, then this is what will happen next: since the particle is unlikely to hit exactly the center of the screen, then at the moment of the explosion a force will appear that turns the starship around its center of mass. Firstly, it will slightly change the direction of flight, and, secondly, it will turn the spaceship, exposing its side to the oncoming flow of particles. And the starship will quickly be torn to pieces by them, and if there are reserves of antimatter on board, then everything will end in a series of annihilation explosions (or one big explosion).
Some authors express hope that it is possible to evade a dangerous meteorite. Let's see what it will look like at sublight speed v=0.1 c. Meteorite weight 0.1 g has a size of approx. 2 mm and energy equivalent 10.9 tons of TNT. Hitting the starship will result in a fatal explosion, and you will have to dodge it. Let us assume that the starship's radar is capable of detecting such a meteorite at a distance X=1000 km - although it is not clear how this will be done, since on the one hand, the radar must be in front of the screen in order to perform its function, and on the other hand, behind the screen so as not to be destroyed by the flow of incoming particles.
But let's say, then in time t = x/v = 0.03 seconds the starship must react and deviate a distance at= 5 m (counting the diameter of the starship 10 meters). This means that it must acquire speed in the transverse direction u=y/t - again in time t , that is, its acceleration must be no less a=y/t 2 = 150 m/s 2 . This is the acceleration in 15 times more than normal, and none of the crew, and many of the spaceship’s instruments, will not be able to withstand it. And if the mass of the starship is about 50 000 tons, then this will require force F= am= 7.5 10 9 newton. Such a force for a time of thousandths of a second can only be obtained by producing a powerful explosion on a starship: with a chemical explosion, a pressure of the order of magnitude is obtained 10 5 atmospheres= 10 10 Newton/m 2 and it will be able to turn the spaceship to the side. That is, in order to avoid the explosion you need to blow up the spaceship...
Thus, even if it is possible to accelerate the spaceship to sublight speed, it will not reach its final goal - there will be too many obstacles on its way. Therefore, interstellar flights can only be carried out at significantly lower speeds, on the order of 0.01 s or less. This means that the colonization of other worlds can occur at a slow pace, since each flight will take hundreds and thousands of years, and for this it will be necessary to send large colonies of people to other stars, capable of existing and developing independently. A small asteroid made of frozen hydrogen could be suitable for such a purpose: a city of suitable size could be built inside it, where astronauts would live, and the asteroid material itself would be used as fuel for a thermonuclear power plant and engine. Modern science cannot offer any other ways to explore deep space.
There is only one positive aspect in all this: the invasion of hordes of aggressive aliens does not threaten the Earth - this is too complicated a matter. But the other side of the coin is that it will not be possible to get to worlds where there are “brothers in mind” within the next few tens of thousands of years. Therefore, the fastest way to detect aliens is to establish communications using radio signals or some other signals.

Bibliography

    1. Novikov I.D. Theory of relativity and interstellar flights - M.: Knowledge, 1960
    2. Perelman R.G. Goals and ways of space exploration - M.: Nauka, 1967
    3. Perelman R.G. Engines of galactic ships - M.: ed. USSR Academy of Sciences, 1962
    4. Burdakov V.P., Danilov Yu.I. External resources and astronautics - M.: Atomizdat, 1976
    5. Zenger E., On the mechanics of photon rockets - M.: ed. Foreign Literature, 1958
    6. Zakirov U.N. Mechanics of relativistic space flights - M.: Nauka, 1984
    7. Allen K.W. Astrophysical quantities - M.: Mir, 1977
    8. Martynov D.Ya. Course of general astrophysics - M.: Nauka, 1971
    9. Physical quantities (Handbook) - M.: Energoatomizdat, 1991
    10. Burdakov V.P., Siegel F.Yu. Physical foundations of astronautics (space physics) - M.: Atomizdat, 1974
    11. Spitzer L. The space between the stars - M.: Mir, 1986.
    12. Lebedinets V.M. Aerosol in the upper atmosphere and cosmic dust - L.: Gidrometeoizdat, 1981
    13. Babajanov P.B. Meteors and their observation - M.: Nauka, 1987
    14. Akishin A.I., Novikov L.S. Impact environment on spacecraft materials - M.: Knowledge, 1983

__________________________________________________ [table of contents]

Optimized for Internet Explorer 1024X768
medium font size
Design by A Semenov

On April 12, 2016, the famous British physicist Stephen Hawking and Russian businessman and philanthropist Yuri Milner announced the allocation of $100 million to finance the project Breakthrough Starshot. The goal of the project was to develop technologies for creating spacecraft capable of making an interstellar flight to Alpha Centauri.

Thousands of science fiction novels describe giant photon starships the size of a small (or large) city, leaving for interstellar flight from the orbit of our planet (less often, from the surface of the Earth). But, according to the authors of the project, Breakthrough Starshot, everything will happen completely differently: on one significant day two thousand of some year, not one or two, but hundreds and thousands of small spaceships the size of a fingernail and weighing 1 g will launch to one of the nearest stars, Alpha Centauri. And each of them will have a thin solar sail with an area of ​​16 m 2, which will carry the spaceship with ever-increasing speed forward - to the stars.

"Shot to the Stars"

The basis of the project Breakthrough Starshot was an article by UC Santa Barbara physics professor Philip Lubin, “A Plan for Interstellar Flight” ( A Roadmap to Interstellar Flight). The main stated goal of the project is to make interstellar flights possible within the lifetime of the next generation of people, that is, not in centuries, but in decades.

Immediately after the official announcement of the program Starshot The authors of the project were hit by a wave of criticism from scientists and technical specialists in various fields. Critical experts noted numerous incorrect assessments and simply “blank spots” in the program plan. Some comments were taken into account and the flight plan was slightly adjusted in the first iteration.

So, the interstellar probe will be a space sailboat with an electronic module StarChip weighing 1 g, connected by heavy-duty straps to a solar sail with an area of ​​16 m 2, a thickness of 100 nm and a mass of 1 g. Of course, the light of our Sun is not enough to accelerate even such a light structure to speeds at which interstellar travel will not last for millennia. Therefore, the main highlight of the project StarShot- this is overclocking using powerful laser radiation, which focuses on the sail. Lubin estimates that with a laser beam power of 50–100 GW, the acceleration will be about 30,000 g, and in a few minutes the probe will reach the speed of 20% of light. The flight to Alpha Centauri will last about 20 years.

Unanswered questions: a wave of criticism

Philip Lubin in his article provides numerical estimates of the points of the plan, but many scientists and specialists are very critical of these data.
Of course, to develop such an ambitious project as Breakthrough Starshot, it takes years of work, and $100 million is not such a large amount for work of this scale. This especially applies to ground infrastructure - a phased array of laser emitters. Installing such a capacity (50–100 GW) will require a gigantic amount of energy, that is, at least a dozen large power plants will need to be built nearby. In addition, it will be necessary to remove a huge amount of heat from the emitters over several minutes, and how to do this is still completely unclear. There are such unanswered questions in the project Breakthrough Starshot a huge amount, but so far the work has just begun.
“The scientific council of our project includes leading experts, scientists and engineers in various relevant fields, including two Nobel laureates,” says Yuri Milner. - And I have heard very balanced assessments of the feasibility of this project. In doing so, we certainly rely on the combined expertise of all members of our scientific council, but at the same time we are open to broader scientific discussion.”

Under the starry sails

One of the key details of the project is the solar sail. In the original version, the sail area was initially only 1 m 2, and because of this, it could not withstand heating during acceleration in the laser radiation field. The new version uses a sail with an area of ​​16 m2, so the thermal regime, although quite harsh, but, according to preliminary estimates, should not melt or destroy the sail. As Philip Lubin himself writes, it is planned to use not metallized coatings, but completely dielectric multilayer mirrors as the basis for the sail: “Such materials are characterized by a moderate reflection coefficient and extremely low absorption. Let’s say, optical glasses for fiber optics are designed for high light fluxes and have an absorption of about twenty trillionths per 1 micron of thickness.” It is not easy to achieve a good reflection coefficient from a dielectric with a sail thickness of 100 nm, which is much less than the wavelength. But the project's authors have some hope in using new approaches, such as monolayers of metamaterial with a negative refractive index.

Solar sail

One of the main elements of the project is a solar sail with an area of ​​16 m2 and a mass of only 1 g. The sail material is multilayer dielectric mirrors that reflect 99.999% of the incident light (according to preliminary calculations, this should be enough to prevent the sail from melting in a radiation field of 100- GW laser). A more promising approach, which makes it possible to make the thickness of the sail smaller than the wavelength of reflected light, is to use a monolayer of metamaterial with a negative refractive index as the basis of the sail (such a material also has nanoperforation, which further reduces its mass). The second option is to use a material not with a high reflection coefficient, but with a low absorption coefficient (10 −9), such as optical materials for light guides.

“You also have to consider that the reflection from dielectric mirrors is tuned to a narrow range of wavelengths, and as the probe accelerates, the Doppler effect shifts the wavelength by more than 20%,” says Lubin. - We took this into account, so the reflector will be adjusted to approximately twenty percent of the radiation bandwidth. We designed such reflectors. If required, reflectors with larger bandwidths are also available.”

Laser machine

The main power plant of the spaceship will not fly to the stars - it will be located on Earth. This is a ground-based phased array of laser emitters measuring 1×1 km. The total laser power should be from 50 to 100 GW (this is equivalent to the power of 10–20 Krasnoyarsk hydroelectric power stations). It is supposed to use phasing (that is, changing the phases on each individual emitter) to focus radiation with a wavelength of 1.06 μm from the entire grating into a spot with a diameter of several meters at distances up to many millions of kilometers (the maximum focusing accuracy is 10 −9 radians). But such focusing is greatly hampered by the turbulent atmosphere, which blurs the beam into a spot approximately the size of an arcsecond (10 −5 radians). Improvements of four orders of magnitude are expected to be achieved using adaptive optics (AO), which will compensate for atmospheric distortions. Best systems adaptive optics in modern telescopes reduce blur to 30 milliseconds of arc, that is, there are still about two and a half orders of magnitude left to the intended target. “To overcome small-scale atmospheric turbulence, the phased array must be broken down into very small elements, the size of the emitting element for our wavelength should be no more than 20–25 cm,” explains Philip Lubin. - This is at least 20 million emitters, but this number does not scare me. For feedback In the AO system we plan to use many reference sources - beacons - both on the probe, and on the mother ship, and in the atmosphere. In addition, we will track the probe on its way to the target. We also want to use the stars as a buoy to adjust the phasing of the array when receiving the signal from the probe upon arrival, but will track the probe to be sure.”

Arrival

But then the probe arrived in the Alpha Centauri system, photographed the surroundings of the system and the planet (if there are any). This information must be somehow transmitted to Earth, and the power of the probe's laser transmitter is limited to a few watts. And five years later this weak signal must be accepted on Earth, isolating stars from the background radiation. According to the authors of the project, the probe maneuvers at the target in such a way that the sail turns into a Fresnel lens, focusing the probe signal in the direction of the Earth. It is estimated that an ideal lens with ideal focusing and ideal orientation amplifies a 1 W signal to 10 13 W isotropic equivalent. But how can we consider this signal against the background of much more powerful (by 13–14 orders of magnitude!) radiation from the star? “The light from the star is actually quite weak because the linewidth of our laser is very small. A narrow line is a key factor in reducing background, says Lubin. - The idea of ​​making a Fresnel lens out of a sail based on a thin-film diffractive element is quite complex and requires a lot of preliminary work to understand exactly how best to do this. This point is actually one of the main ones in our project plan.”

Interstellar flight is not a matter of centuries, but of decades

Yuri Milner ,
Russian businessman and philanthropist,
Founder of Breakthrough Initiatives:
Over the past 15 years, significant, one might say, revolutionary advances have taken place in three technological areas: miniaturization of electronic components, the creation of a new generation of materials, and also the reduction in cost and increase in laser power. The combination of these three trends leads to the theoretical possibility of accelerating a nanosatellite to almost relativistic speeds. At the first stage (5–10 years), we plan to conduct a more in-depth scientific and engineering study to understand how feasible this project is. On the project website there is a list of about 20 serious technical problems, without solving which we will not be able to move forward. This is not a definitive list, but based on the opinion of the scientific council, we believe that the first stage of the project has sufficient motivation. I know that the star sail project is subject to serious criticism from experts, but I think that the position of some critical experts is associated with a not entirely accurate understanding of what we are really proposing. We are not financing a flight to another star, but rather realistic multi-purpose developments related to the idea of ​​an interstellar probe only in a general direction. These technologies will be used both for flights in the solar system and for protection from dangerous asteroids. But setting such an ambitious strategic goal as interstellar flight seems justified in the sense that the development of technology over the past 10-20 years probably makes the implementation of such a project not a matter of centuries, as many assumed, but rather of decades.

On the other hand, a phased array of optical emitters/radiation receivers with a total aperture of a kilometer is an instrument capable of seeing exoplanets from distances of tens of parsecs. Using tunable wavelength receivers, the composition of the atmosphere of exoplanets can be determined. Are probes needed at all in this case? “Certainly, using a phased array as a very large telescope opens up new possibilities in astronomy. But, adds Lubin, we plan to add an infrared spectrometer to the probe as a longer-term program in addition to the camera and other sensors. We have a great photonics group at UC Santa Barbara that is part of the collaboration.”

But in any case, according to Lubin, the first flights will be made within the solar system: “Because we can send a huge number of probes, this gives us many different possibilities. We can also send similar small ( wafer-scale, that is, on a chip) probes on conventional rockets and use the same technologies to study the Earth or the planets and their satellites in the solar system."

The editors thank the newspaper “Troitsky Option - Science” and its editor-in-chief Boris Stern for their assistance in preparing the article.

And left the solar system; Now they are used to study interstellar space. At the beginning of the 21st century, there are no stations whose direct mission would be to fly to the nearest stars.

The distance to the nearest star (Proxima Centauri) is about 4,243 light years, that is, about 268 thousand times the distance from Earth to the Sun.

Starship projects driven by the pressure of electromagnetic waves

In 1971, in a report by G. Marx at a symposium in Byurakan, it was proposed to use X-ray lasers for interstellar travel. The possibility of using this type of propulsion was later investigated by NASA. As a result, the following conclusion was made: “If the possibility of creating a laser operating in the X-ray wavelength range is found, then we can talk about real development aircraft(accelerated by the beam of such a laser), which will be able to cover distances to the nearest stars much faster than all currently known systems with rocket engines. Calculations show that using the space system considered in this work, it is possible to reach the star Alpha Centauri... in about 10 years."

In 1985, R. Forward proposed the design of an interstellar probe accelerated by microwave energy. The project envisaged that the probe would reach the nearest stars in 21 years.

At the 36th International Astronomical Congress, a project for a laser starship was proposed, the movement of which is provided by the energy of optical lasers located in orbit around Mercury. According to calculations, the path of a starship of this design to the star Epsilon Eridani (10.8 light years) and back would take 51 years.

Annihilation engines

The main problems identified by scientists and engineers who analyzed the designs of annihilation rockets are obtaining the required amount of antimatter, storing it, and focusing the flow of particles in the desired direction. It is indicated that the current state of science and technology does not even theoretically allow the creation of such structures.

Ramjet engines powered by interstellar hydrogen

The main component of the mass of modern rockets is the mass of fuel required by the rocket for acceleration. If we can somehow use the environment surrounding the rocket as a working fluid and fuel, we can significantly reduce the mass of the rocket and thereby achieve high speeds.

Generation ships

Interstellar travel is also possible using starships that implement the concept of “generation ships” (for example, like O’Neil’s colonies). In such starships, a closed biosphere is created and maintained, capable of maintaining and reproducing itself for several thousand years. The flight occurs at low speed and takes a very long time, during which many generations of astronauts manage to change.

FTL propulsion

Notes

see also

Sources

  • Kolesnikov Yu. V. You should build starships. M., 1990. 207 p. ISBN 5-08-000617-X.
  • http://www.gazeta.ru/science/2008/01/30_a_2613225.shtml?4 Lecture on interstellar flights, on acceleration of 100 km/sec near stars

Let's say the Earth is ending. The sun is about to explode, and an asteroid the size of Texas is approaching the planet. Large cities are inhabited by zombies, and in the countryside farmers are planting corn intensively because other crops are dying. We urgently need to leave the planet, but the problem is that no wormholes have been discovered in the Saturn region, and no superluminal engines have been brought from a galaxy far, far away. The nearest star is more than four light years away. Will humanity be able to achieve it with modern technology? The answer is not so obvious.

It is unlikely that anyone would argue that a global environmental disaster that would threaten the existence of all life on Earth can only happen in the movies. Mass extinctions have occurred more than once on our planet, during which up to 90% of existing species died. The Earth experienced periods of global glaciation, collided with asteroids, and went through bursts of volcanic activity.

Of course, even during the most terrible disasters life never completely disappeared. But the same cannot be said about the dominant species at that time, which died out, making way for others. Who is the dominant species now? Exactly.

It is likely that the opportunity to leave your home and go to the stars in search of something new can someday save humanity. However, we should hardly hope that some cosmic benefactors will open the way to the stars for us. It’s worth calculating what our theoretical capabilities are to reach the stars on our own.

Space Ark

First of all, traditional chemical traction engines come to mind. At the moment, four earthly vehicles (all of them were launched back in the 1970s) have managed to develop a third escape velocity, sufficient to leave the solar system forever.

The fastest of them, Voyager 1, has moved away from Earth to a distance of 130 AU in the 37 years since its launch. (astronomical units, that is, 130 distances from the Earth to the Sun). Each year the device travels approximately 3.5 AU. The distance to Alpha Centauri is 4.36 light years, or 275,725 AU. At this speed, the device will take almost 79 thousand years to reach the neighboring star. To put it mildly, it will be a long wait.

Photo of the Earth (above the arrow) from a distance of 6 billion kilometers, taken by Voyager 1. The spacecraft covered this distance in 13 years.

You can find a way to fly faster, or you can just resign yourself and fly for several thousand years. Then only the distant descendants of those who went on the journey will reach the final point. This is precisely the idea of ​​the so-called generation ship - a space ark, which is a closed ecosystem designed for a long journey.

There are many different stories about generation ships in science fiction. Harry Garrison (“Captured Universe”), Clifford Simak (“Generation That Achieved the Goal”), Brian Aldiss (“Non Stopping”), and among more modern writers Bernard Werber (“Star Butterfly”) wrote about them. Quite often, distant descendants of the first inhabitants completely forget about where they flew from and what the purpose of their journey was. Or even begin to believe that all existing world comes down to a ship, as, for example, in Robert Heinlein's novel Stepsons of the Universe. Another interesting plot is shown in the eighth episode of the third season of the classic Star Trek, where the crew of the Enterprise tries to prevent a collision between a generation ship, whose inhabitants have forgotten about their mission, and the inhabited planet to which it was heading.

The advantage of the generation ship is that this option will not require fundamentally new engines. However, it will be necessary to develop a self-sustaining ecosystem that can survive without external supplies for many thousands of years. And don’t forget that people can simply kill each other.

The Biosphere 2 experiment, conducted in the early 1990s under a closed dome, demonstrated a number of dangers that can await people during such travel. This includes the rapid division of the team into several groups hostile to each other, and the uncontrolled proliferation of pests, which caused a lack of oxygen in the air. Even the ordinary wind, as it turns out, plays vital role- without regular rocking, trees become fragile and break.

Technology that immerses people in long-term suspended animation will help solve many of the problems of long-term flight. Then neither conflicts nor boredom are scary, and a minimal life support system will be required. The main thing is to provide it with energy for a long time. For example, using a nuclear reactor.

Related to the theme of the generation ship is a very interesting paradox called Wait Calculation, described by scientist Andrew Kennedy. According to this paradox, for some time after the first generation ship departs, new, faster modes of travel may be discovered on Earth, allowing later ships to overtake the original settlers. So it is possible that by the time of arrival the destination will already be overpopulated by the distant descendants of the colonizers who went later.

Installations for suspended animation in the film "Alien".

Riding a nuclear bomb

Suppose we are not satisfied that the descendants of our descendants will reach the stars, and we ourselves want to expose our face to the rays of someone else’s sun. In this case, one cannot do without a spaceship capable of accelerating to speeds that will deliver it to a neighboring star in less than one human lifetime. And here the good old nuclear bomb will help.

The idea of ​​such a ship appeared in the late 1950s. The spacecraft was intended for flights within the solar system, but it could also be used for interstellar travel. The principle of its operation is as follows: a powerful armored plate is installed behind the stern. Low-power nuclear charges are uniformly ejected from the spacecraft in the direction opposite to the flight, which are detonated at a short distance (up to 100 meters).

The charges are designed in such a way that most of the explosion products are directed towards the tail of the spacecraft. The reflective plate receives the impulse and transmits it to the ship through the shock absorber system (without it, overloads will be detrimental to the crew). The reflective plate is protected from damage by light flash, gamma radiation streams and high-temperature plasma by a coating of graphite lubricant, which is re-sprayed after each detonation.

The NERVA project is an example of a nuclear rocket engine.

At first glance, such a scheme seems crazy, but it is quite viable. During one of the nuclear tests on Enewetak Atoll, graphite-coated steel spheres were placed 9 meters from the center of the explosion. After testing, they were found undamaged, which proves the effectiveness of graphite protection for the ship. But the Treaty Banning Tests of Nuclear Weapons in the Atmosphere, Outer Space and Under Water, signed in 1963, put an end to this idea.

Arthur C. Clarke wanted to equip the Discovery One spaceship from the movie 2001: A Space Odyssey with some kind of nuclear explosion engine. However, Stanley Kubrick asked him to abandon the idea, fearing that audiences would consider it a parody of his film Dr. Strangelove, or How I Stopped Being Scared and Loved the Atom Bomb.

What speed can be achieved using a series of nuclear explosions? Most information exists about the Orion explosion project, which was developed in the late 1950s in the USA with the participation of scientists Theodore Taylor and Freeman Dyson. The 400,000-ton ship was planned to accelerate to 3.3% of the speed of light - then the flight to the Alpha Centauri system would last 133 years. However, according to current estimates, in a similar way it is possible to accelerate the ship to 10% of the speed of light. In this case, the flight will last approximately 45 years, which will allow the crew to survive until they arrive at their destination.

Of course, building such a ship is a very expensive undertaking. Dyson estimates that Orion would cost approximately $3 trillion in today's dollars to build. But if we find out that our planet is facing a global catastrophe, then it is likely that a ship with a nuclear pulse engine will be humanity’s last chance for survival.

Gas giant

A further development of the Orion ideas was the project of the unmanned spacecraft Daedalus, which was developed in the 1970s by a group of scientists from the British Interplanetary Society. The researchers set out to design an unmanned spacecraft capable of reaching one of the nearest stars during a human lifetime, conducting scientific research and transmitting the information received to Earth. The main condition of the study was the use of either existing or foreseeable technologies in the project.

The target of the flight was Barnard's Star, located at a distance of 5.91 light years from us - in the 1970s it was believed that several planets revolved around this star. We now know that there are no planets in this system. The Daedalus developers set their sights on creating an engine that could deliver the ship to its destination in no more than 50 years. As a result, they came up with the idea of ​​a two-stage apparatus.

The necessary acceleration was provided by a series of low-power nuclear explosions occurring inside a special propulsion system. Microscopic granules of a mixture of deuterium and helium-3, irradiated with a stream of high-energy electrons, were used as fuel. According to the project, up to 250 explosions per second were supposed to occur in the engine. The nozzle was a powerful magnetic field created by the ship's power plants.

According to the plan, the first stage of the ship operated for two years, accelerating the ship to 7% the speed of light. The Daedalus then jettisoned its spent propulsion system, removing most of its mass, and fired its second stage, which allowed it to accelerate to a final speed of 12.2% lightspeed. This would make it possible to reach Barnard's Star 49 years after launch. It would take another 6 years to transmit the signal to Earth.

The total mass of the Daedalus was 54 thousand tons, of which 50 thousand were thermonuclear fuel. However, the supposed helium-3 is extremely rare on Earth - but it is abundant in the atmospheres of gas giants. Therefore, the authors of the project intended to extract helium-3 on Jupiter using an automated plant “floating” in its atmosphere; the entire mining process would take approximately 20 years. In the same orbit of Jupiter, it was planned to carry out the final assembly of the ship, which would then launch to another star system.

The most difficult element in the entire Daedalus concept was precisely the extraction of helium-3 from the atmosphere of Jupiter. To do this, it was necessary to fly to Jupiter (which is also not so easy and fast), establish a base on one of the satellites, build a plant, store fuel somewhere... And this is not to mention the powerful radiation belts around the gas giant, which additionally would make life more difficult for technology and engineers.

Another problem was that Daedalus did not have the ability to slow down and enter orbit around Barnard's Star. The ship and the probes it launched would simply pass by the star along the flyby path, covering the entire system in a few days.

Now an international group of twenty scientists and engineers, operating under the auspices of the British Interplanetary Society, is working on the Icarus spacecraft project. “Icarus” is a kind of “remake” of Daedalus, taking into account the knowledge and technology accumulated over the past 30 years. One of the main areas of work is the search for other types of fuel that could be produced on Earth.

At the speed of light

Is it possible to accelerate a spaceship to the speed of light? This problem can be solved in several ways. The most promising of them is an antimatter annihilation engine. The principle of its operation is as follows: antimatter is fed into the working chamber, where it comes into contact with ordinary matter, generating a controlled explosion. The ions generated during the explosion are ejected through the engine nozzle, creating thrust. Of all possible engines, annihilation theoretically allows one to achieve the highest speeds. The interaction of matter and antimatter releases a colossal amount of energy, and the speed of the outflow of particles formed during this process is close to that of light.

But here the question of fuel extraction arises. Antimatter itself has long ceased to be science fiction - scientists first managed to synthesize antihydrogen back in 1995. But it is impossible to obtain it in sufficient quantities. Currently, antimatter can only be produced using particle accelerators. Moreover, the amount of substance they create is measured in tiny fractions of grams, and its cost is astronomical. For one billionth of a gram of antimatter, scientists from the European Nuclear Research Center (the same one where they created the Large Hadron Collider) had to spend several hundred million Swiss francs. On the other hand, the cost of production will gradually decrease and in the future may reach much more acceptable values.

In addition, we will have to come up with a way to store antimatter - after all, upon contact with ordinary matter, it is instantly annihilated. One solution is to cool the antimatter to ultra-low temperatures and use magnetic traps to prevent it from coming into contact with the walls of the tank. The current record storage time for antimatter is 1000 seconds. Not years, of course, but taking into account the fact that the first time antimatter was contained for only 172 milliseconds, there is progress.

And even faster

Numerous science fiction films have taught us that it is possible to get to other star systems much faster than in a few years. It is enough to turn on the warp engine or hyperspace drive, sit back comfortably in your chair - and within a few minutes you will find yourself on the other side of the galaxy. The theory of relativity prohibits travel at speeds exceeding the speed of light, but at the same time leaves loopholes to circumvent these restrictions. If they could tear apart or stretch space-time, they could travel faster than light without breaking any laws.

A gap in space is better known as a wormhole or wormhole. Physically, it is a tunnel connecting two remote regions of space-time. Why not use such a tunnel to travel into deep space? The fact is that the creation of such a wormhole requires the presence of two singularities at different points in the universe (this is what is beyond the event horizon of black holes - in fact, gravity in its purest form), which can tear apart space-time, creating a tunnel that allows travelers to “ shortcut through hyperspace.

In addition, to maintain such a tunnel in a stable state, it must be filled with exotic matter with negative energy, and the existence of such matter has not yet been proven. In any case, only a supercivilization can create a wormhole, which will be many thousands of years ahead of the current one in development and whose technologies, from our point of view, will be similar to magic.

The second, more affordable option is to “stretch” the space. In 1994, Mexican theoretical physicist Miguel Alcubierre proposed that it was possible to change its geometry by creating a wave that compresses the space in front of the ship and expands it behind. Thus, the starship will find itself in a “bubble” of curved space, which itself will move faster than light, thanks to which the ship will not violate fundamental physical principles. According to Alcubierre himself, .

True, the scientist himself considered that it would be impossible to implement such a technology in practice, since this would require a colossal amount of mass-energy. The first calculations gave values ​​exceeding the mass of the entire existing Universe; subsequent refinements reduced it to “only” Jupiterian.

But in 2011, Harold White, who heads the Eagleworks research group at NASA, carried out calculations that showed that if you change some parameters, then creating an Alcubierre bubble may require much less energy than previously thought, and it will no longer be necessary to recycle the entire planet. Now White's group is working on the possibility of an "Alcubierre bubble" in practice.

If the experiments yield results, this will be the first small step towards creating an engine that allows travel 10 times faster than the speed of light. Of course, a spacecraft using the Alcubierre bubble will travel many tens, or even hundreds of years later. But the very prospect that this is actually possible is already breathtaking.

Flight of the Valkyrie

Almost all proposed starship projects have one significant drawback: they weigh tens of thousands of tons, and their creation requires a huge number of launches and assembly operations in orbit, which increases the cost of construction by an order of magnitude. But if humanity nevertheless learns to obtain large amounts of antimatter, it will have an alternative to these bulky structures.

In the 1990s, writer Charles Pelegrino and physicist Jim Powell proposed a starship design known as Valkyrie. It can be described as something like a space tractor. The ship is a combination of two annihilation engines connected to each other by a super-strong cable 20 kilometers long. In the center of the bundle there are several compartments for the crew. The ship uses the first engine to reach near light speed, and the second to reduce it when entering orbit around the star. Thanks to the use of a cable instead of a rigid structure, the mass of the ship is only 2,100 tons (for comparison, the ISS weighs 400 tons), of which 2,000 tons are engines. Theoretically, such a ship can accelerate to a speed of 92% of the speed of light.

A modified version of this ship, called the Venture Star, is shown in the film Avatar (2011), one of the scientific consultants of which was Charles Pelegrino. Venture Star sets off on a journey, propelled by lasers and a 16-kilometer solar sail, before stopping at Alpha Centauri using an antimatter engine. On the way back the sequence changes. The ship is capable of accelerating to 70% the speed of light and reaching Alpha Centauri in less than 7 years.

No fuel

Both existing and future rocket engines have one problem - fuel always makes up the majority of their mass at launch. However, there are starship projects that will not need to take fuel with them at all.

In 1960, physicist Robert Bussard proposed the concept of an engine that would use hydrogen found in interstellar space as fuel for a fusion engine. Unfortunately, despite the attractiveness of the idea (hydrogen is the most abundant element in the Universe), it has a number of theoretical problems, ranging from the method of collecting hydrogen to the estimated maximum speed, which is unlikely to exceed 12% of light speed. This means that it will take at least half a century to fly to the Alpha Centauri system.

Another interesting concept is the use of a solar sail. If a huge, super-powerful laser was built in Earth orbit or on the Moon, its energy could be used to accelerate a starship equipped with a giant solar sail to fairly high speeds. True, according to engineers’ calculations, in order to give a manned ship weighing 78,500 tons half the speed of light, a solar sail with a diameter of 1000 kilometers will be required.

Another obvious problem with a starship with a solar sail is that it needs to be slowed down somehow. One of its solutions is to release a second, smaller sail behind the starship when approaching the target. The main one will disconnect from the ship and continue its independent journey.

***

Interstellar travel is a very complex and expensive undertaking. Creating a ship capable of covering space distance in a relatively short period of time is one of the most ambitious tasks facing humanity in the future. Of course, this will require the efforts of several states, if not the entire planet. Now this seems like a utopia - governments have too many things to worry about and too many ways to spend money. A flight to Mars is millions of times simpler than a flight to Alpha Centauri - and yet, it is unlikely that anyone will dare to name the year when it will take place.

Work in this direction can be revived either by a global danger threatening the entire planet, or by the creation of a single planetary civilization that can overcome internal squabbles and wants to leave its cradle. The time for this has not yet come - but this does not mean that it will never come.